On the 60-year anniversary of the publication of what became Moore’s Law, let’s look back and remind ourselves what it’s about.
Here are the basics: Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, predicted in 1965 that innovations in research and development would allow manufacturers to fit twice as many transistors into an integrated circuit every two years. Because this prediction is so fundamental to the history of computing, it’s worth exploring more about it – what it is, what it isn’t, and how manufacturers are continually challenging the laws of physics to uphold Moore’s Law.
Understanding Moore’s Law
Moore’s Law is a prediction and a goal – not a scientific law or a law of physics. Gordon Moore observed that transistors were shrinking at a predictable rate with twice as many transistors being fit into an integrated circuit every year. The law wasn’t formulated all at once. Moore’s initial prediction was published on April 19, 1965, when he answered a question posed by Electronics Magazine asking about his predictions for the next 10 years of computing. Moore initially predicted a doubling every year and then revised his prediction about 10 years later.
In its final form, Moore’s Law predicted that chipmakers would be able to double the number of transistors within an integrated circuit once every two years.
Chipmakers have deliberately pushed themselves to uphold Moore’s Law. Until 2016, the semiconductor industry built their roadmaps with Moore’s Law in mind. As semiconductor manufacturing matures, however, the industry is running up against the limits of what’s possible with existing materials.
Moore’s Law isn’t absolute and even Moore himself admitted that his prediction couldn’t hold forever. As transistors enter the Angstrom era, it becomes harder and more costly to develop and manufacture them. As a result, instead of doubling every two years, transistor densities now double approximately once every 30 months.
Upholding Moore’s Law
Semiconductor manufacturers continue to test the laws of physics by pursuing smaller nodes. There are a few ways to continue pursuing the economic pathway laid out by Moore’s Law. These include:
In addition, research continues on technologies that would fundamentally alter the nature of computation. Quantum computing would allow computers to achieve faster processing speeds by harnessing the subatomic properties of matter. Biological computing would replace processors with lab-grown neurons. More realistically, researchers have proposed replacing traditional doped silicon with new materials such as graphene or indium gallium arsenide.
Supporting Moore’s Law at Entegris
What Moore’s Law really illustrates is the power of exponential growth. With the consistent doubling predicted by the law, computers have increased processing speed at lower costs. The phone in your pocket is now more powerful than the computers that controlled the first crewed spaceflight to the Moon. Computers allow us to research advanced pharmaceuticals, explore photorealistic videogame worlds, and ride in autonomous vehicles – achievements that would have been unthinkable in Moore’s day.
Here at Entegris, we’re focused on developing the solutions and materials needed to keep Moore’s Law in effect. Whether it’s developing reticle pods for EUV lithography, front-opening universal pods (FOUPs) for 3D-stacked wafers, or precursors, pads, slurries, and cleans for molybdenum interconnects, we’re helping to pave the way for advanced node manufacturers to make even further improvements.
Learn more about Entegris’ solutions that help extend Moore’s Law:
Resource Page: EUV Reticle Pods
Blog: New FOUP Form-Factors for Non-Standard Wafers
White Paper: Migrating to Molybdenum